Welcome to LinuxMedNews
 up a level
 post article
 search
 admin
 Contact
 main


  EMR Software Nexus has Formed
LinuxMedNews Posted by Ignacio H. Valdes, MD, MS on Friday September 07, 2007 @ 03:53 AM
from the Linux Medical News dept.
Recent conversations with knowledgeable colleagues has recently reached a point where it is difficult to have a rational conversation about any aspect of Electronic Medical Record (EMR) software without having to invoke an entire other discipline to speak about it. As well, the lines of demarcation between EMR software engineering, law, licensing, economics, politics and public policy has now become so intertwined that it is becoming nearly impossible to tell where one ends and another begins. A nexus may have formed in which these are inextricably linked. Digg this article

A corollary to this nexus is that a software engineer by the act of simply publishing a piece of EMR software may be actively engaging in a political, economics, law, licensing, and public policy exercise simultaneously. Just as the act of creation of EMR software is now inextricably linked with no clear dividing line between law, licensing, economics, politics and public policy the players themselves are difficult to classify.

For example, the relationship of EMR software and licenses. Readers of Linux Medical News are familiar with the proprietary vs. Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) in medicine debate with most of the LMN crowd in favor of FOSS licenses such as the GPL.

Oh for the simple days in which FOSS vs. proprietary was a clear demarcation line! Now, national politics and law are increasingly coming into play with Stark law exceptions, CCHIT certification, RHIO's and possible financial incentives to EHR adoption. One commonality of these political and legal changes may be the favoring of big players which could result in cartels.

A relative newcomer on the scene is the not-for-profit vs. for-profit corporate structure and governance models as well as the power of advocacy. There appears to be several successes with non-profits but it is still too early to tell.

So in the next collegial discussion, beware of the black/white thinker who thinks they see a clear dividing line among all of these topics and players. Reality among EMR software has become far stranger than fiction.

<  |  >

 

  Related Links
  • Articles on LinuxMedNews
  • Also by Ignacio H. Valdes, MD, MS
  • Contact author
  • The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
    ( Reply )

    Re: EMR Software Nexus has Formed
    by pacoit on Sunday September 09, 2007 @ 12:06 AM

    I think the Personally controlled Health Record (PCHR) is the key that collapses the ownership/legal/liability complexities created by the RHIO and company approach. The hub is not an RHIO but an individual's PCHR. You own your data (self evident). Host your PCHR with whomever you trust. Your doctor doesn't pass your info to others; your doctor tells you who needs to see it, and you give them access. No ownership questions; no legal/liability issues.

    We must establish an efficient EDI solution so we can all confidently get on with creating applications. If HL7/CCR is acceptable to all, let's go with it. If not, consider a generic datamodel on top of which custom views can be built, and any data structure can be imported to or exported from. I suggest looking at ISO standard Topic Maps for both the generic data model concept and its EDI format, xtm. It seems so much simpler, yet more flexible than HL7/CCR.

    http://www.isotopicmaps.org/sam/
    http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/tao.html
    [ Reply to this ]
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
    ( Reply )


     
    Google
     
    www.linuxmednews.com Web
    Advertisement: CCHIT certified EMR and Medical Practice Management Software from Medical Software Associates makes patient management easy. Free practice management and medical billing software demo available.
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ©2000-2006 Ignacio Valdes, MD, MS.