up a level  post article  search  admin  Contact  main  parent  thread	Re: Review: Linux vs. Windows 98 Scanning by K. Brauchli on Monday February 04, 2002 @ 06:53 PM Hmmm, beats me. Have you tried the linux-usb forum? https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users -- IV	Related Links Articles on LinuxMedNews Also by K. Brauchli Contact author
	The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. ( Reply ) Re: Review: Linux vs. Windows 98 Scanning by ./be on Tuesday February 05, 2002 @ 05:57 AM Saint! I have done some web searching about ScanJet 3xxxC series. I found that this type of scaner talks to USB port newest language version that older linux-scaner-software do not understand. The #cat /proc/..../usb product proper device status, that make me sure that scaner itself is well connected and is ready to receive orders. I have install the linux scaner soft xsane properlly and it tels that no devices found. I do not understand why you edit epson.conf if it is not used by xsane. aha, GIMP also refuse to scan, it uses plugin xsane. StarOffice have his owne driver which not detect anything. Any Idea to solve problem? [ Reply to this ] The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. ( Reply )

	www.linuxmednews.com Web
Advertisement: CCHIT certified EMR and Medical Practice Management Software from Medical Software Associates makes patient management easy. Free practice management and medical billing software demo available.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ©2000-2006 Ignacio Valdes, MD, MS.