up a level  post article  search  admin  Contact  main  parent	Re: Review: Linux vs. Windows 98 Scanning by AC on Thursday May 24, 2001 @ 04:22 AM Perhaps its due to the post-processing, but I noticed that the filesize of the windoze generated picture is about 50% bigger than the linux one... (138K vs. 89K)	Related Links Articles on LinuxMedNews Also by AC Contact author
	The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. ( Reply ) Re: Review: Linux vs. Windows 98 Scanning by Michael Wood on Thursday May 24, 2001 @ 08:19 AM Maybe that's also why the Linux scan looks so fuzzy compared to the Windows version. Perhaps the images should have been saved in a lossless format e.g. PNG instead. [ Reply to this ] Re: Review: Linux vs. Windows 98 Scanning by Saint on Thursday May 24, 2001 @ 10:16 PM Possibly the compression is different? -- Saint [ Reply to this ] The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. ( Reply )

	www.linuxmednews.com Web
Advertisement: CCHIT certified EMR and Medical Practice Management Software from Medical Software Associates makes patient management easy. Free practice management and medical billing software demo available.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ©2000-2006 Ignacio Valdes, MD, MS.